United States v. Heldt’s Empirical Analysis
745 F.2d 1275 · 1984
Citation profile
77 federal appellate · 4 district · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 113 later decisions — most recently January 2020 · most notably United States v. Gaskin (2004), United States v. Wallace (1988)
77 federal appellate · 4 district · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2311 (Anti Car Theft Act of 1992) · 18 U.S.C. § 2312 · 18 U.S.C. § 2314 · 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (§ 101 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974) · 18 U.S.C. § 3162 (§ 101 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974)
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Johnson v. Zerbst · Massiah v. United States · Bordenkircher v. Hayes · Michigan v. Mosley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 113 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the applicable statute of limitations, the due process clause of the fifth amendment, the general sixth amendment right to a speedy trial, and the power of the court to dismiss a case in its entirety”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Any information or indictment charging an individual with the commission of an offense shall be filed within thirty days from the date on which such individual was arrested or served with a summons in connection with such charges.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[B]ringing additional charges because the defendant was not willing to plea bargain was permissible prosecutorial discretion.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.