Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 745 F.2d 340 - Estran v. Heckler

Estran v. Heckler’s Empirical Analysis

745 F.2d 340 · 1984

Citation profile

58
cited by 58 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
March 2012
most recently cited

22 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 58 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2012 · most notably Bowen v. Yuckert (1987), Salmi v. Secretary of Health & Human Services (1985)

22 federal appellate · 2 district ·

3901984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. Heckler · Chico v. Schweiker · United States v. Cartwright · D U.S. v. Alsup

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'[A]n impairment can be considered as not severe only if it is a slight abnormality which has such minimal effect on the individual that it would not be expected to interfere with the individual's ability to work, irrespective of age, education or work experience.'”
    13 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “... a slight neurosis, slight impairment of sight or hearing, or other slight abnormality or combination of abnormalities.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[a]n impairment is not severe if it does not significantly limit your physical or mental abilities to do basic work activities.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.