Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 745 F.2d 383 - Garner v. Heckler

Garner v. Heckler’s Empirical Analysis

745 F.2d 383 · 1984

Citation profile

418
cited by 418 later decisions
March 2020
most recently cited

215 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 418 later decisions — most recently March 2020 · most notably Salmi v. Secretary of Health & Human Services (1985), Walters v. Commissioner of Social Security (1997)

215 federal appellate · 3 district ·

140019841990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1382 (§ 1611 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1382C (§ 1614 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board · Richardson v. Perales · Kirk v. Secretary of Health & Human Services · Beavers v. Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 418 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.”
    81 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “may not try the case de novo, nor resolve conflicts in evidence, nor decide questions of credibility.”
    42 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'must take into account whatever in the record fairly detracts from its weight.'”
    27 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.