Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 745 F.2d 400 - United States v. August

United States v. August’s Empirical Analysis

745 F.2d 400 · 1984

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
February 2000
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently February 2000

11 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

110198419902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1503 · 18 U.S.C. § 152 · 18 U.S.C. § 201 (Bank Bribery Amendments) · 18 U.S.C. § 371

Relies on Kotteakos v. United States · Quercia v. United States · Harris v. McRae · United States v. Murdock · Exxon Corp. v. Department of Revenue of Wisconsin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “determine the weight and credibility to be given to this testimony”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.