¶1Ernest L. Keathley, Jr., St. Louis, Mo., for appellant.
¶2Harry B. Wilson, Reuben A. Shelton, Husch, Eppenberger, Donohue, Elson & Cornfeld, St. Louis, Mo., for appellee.
¶3Before ARNOLD, Circuit Judge, HENLEY, Senior Circuit Judge, and FAGG, Circuit Judge.
¶5LeVelle Clay brought this suit against his former employer, Consumer Programs, Inc., under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, claiming racial discrimination. The District Court1 found that the defendant had not discriminated against Clay. Clay v. Consumer Programs, Inc., 576 F.Supp. 185 (E.D.Mo.1983). We have considered each of the arguments made on appeal by plaintiff and are not persuaded that any error of law has been committed, nor that the District Court’s findings of fact are clearly erroneous. The judgment is therefore affirmed on the basis of the District Court’s published opinion.
¶6Affirmed.