Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

745 F.2d 501

Docket No. 83-2658.

Clay v. Consumer Programs, Inc.

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Aug. 1, 1984.

Decided Sept. 6, 1984.

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1984-09-06

2 counsel of record

Relies on Clay v. Consumer Programs, Inc.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1984-09-06

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2018 · most notably Rutan v. Republican Party of Illinois (1990), Arnaldo Jimenez Fuentes v. Honorable Jaime Torres Gaztambide (1986)

31 federal appellate ·

2401984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Ernest L. Keathley, Jr., St. Louis, Mo., for appellant.

¶2Harry B. Wilson, Reuben A. Shelton, Husch, Eppenberger, Donohue, Elson & Cornfeld, St. Louis, Mo., for appellee.

¶3Before ARNOLD, Circuit Judge, HENLEY, Senior Circuit Judge, and FAGG, Circuit Judge.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5LeVelle Clay brought this suit against his former employer, Consumer Programs, Inc., under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, claiming racial discrimination. The District Court1 found that the defendant had not discriminated against Clay. Clay v. Consumer Programs, Inc., 576 F.Supp. 185 (E.D.Mo.1983). We have considered each of the arguments made on appeal by plaintiff and are not persuaded that any error of law has been committed, nor that the District Court’s findings of fact are clearly erroneous. The judgment is therefore affirmed on the basis of the District Court’s published opinion.

¶6Affirmed.

/745/f2d/501 · .json · Public domain