Singer v. Wadman’s Empirical Analysis
745 F.2d 606 · 1984
Citation profile
31 federal appellate · 11 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 61 later decisions — most recently August 2019 · most notably Abercrombie v. City of Catoosa (1990), Woodrum v. Woodward County (1989)
31 federal appellate · 11 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 144 · 28 U.S.C. § 455 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co. · Hanrahan v. Hampton · Barrett v. Zweibon · Hampton v. Hanrahan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“was filed about one year after the complaint was filed and after appellants had suffered some adverse rulings on interlocutory matters.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Burke v. Regalado“a challenge to the theocratic power structure of Utah”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.