City of Angels Broadcasting, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission’s Empirical Analysis
745 F.2d 656 · 1984
Citation profile
22 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently April 2020 · most notably Marshall County Health Care Authority v. Shalala (1993), Dickson v. Secretary of Defense (1995)
22 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 47 U.S.C. § 154 · 47 U.S.C. § 307 · 47 U.S.C. § 309 · 47 U.S.C. § 402 · 5 U.S.C. § 706
Relies on Udall v. Tallman · Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc. · Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications Commission · Mansion House Center South Redevelopment Co. v. United States · Bowsher v. Merck & Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“an extremely heavy burden looms before a party seeking to overturn a final administrative order on grounds of staleness.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Herrington · Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. John S. Herrington, Secretary, U.S. Department of Energy, Hydronics Institute, Florida Department of Community Affairs, Intervenors. California State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission v. Department of Energy, and John S. Herrington, Secretary of the Department of Energy, Hydronics Institute, Florida Department of Community Affairs, Intervenors. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. John S. Herrington, Secretary, U.S. Department of Energy, State of Texas, Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers, Whirlpool Corporation, Air Conditioning and Refrigeration Institute, Gas Appliance Manufacturers Assoc., Hydronics Institute, Florida Department of Community Affairs, Intervenors. California State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission v. Department of Energy, and John S. Herrington, Secretary of the Department of Energy, Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers, Whirlpool Corporation, Gas Appliance Manufacturers Assoc., Air-Conditioning and Refrigeration Institute, Intervenors. The State of Minnesota, by Its Attorney General, Hubert H. Humphrey III v. The United States Department of Energy, John S. Herrington, Secretary, State of New York v. United States Department of Energy, Whirlpool Corporation & Heil-Quaker Corporation, Air-Conditioning and Refrigeration Institute, Gas Appliance Manufacturing Assoc., Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers, Intervenors“enjoys wide discretion in fashioning its own procedures,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.