Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 745 F.2d 677 - Association of Data Processing Service Organizations Inc v. Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System Association of Data Processing Service Organizations Inc

Association of Data Processing Service Organizations Inc v. Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System Association of Data Processing Service Organizations Inc’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

208
cited by 208 later decisions
July 2025
most recently cited

65 federal appellate · 58 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 208 later decisions — most recently July 2025 · most notably Sevoian v. Ashcroft (2002), In re Gartside (2000)

65 federal appellate · 58 district ·

59019841990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Camp v. Pitts · National Labor Relations Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co. · Illinois Central Railroad Company v. Norfolk and Western Railway Company Calumet Harbor Terminals Inc · Portland Cement Ass'n v. Ruckelshaus · Securities Industry Ass'n v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 208 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law.”
    41 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[W]hether the administrator was arbitrary must be determined on the basis of what he had before him when he acted.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “[T]his does not consign paragraph (E) of the APA's judicial review section to pointlessness. The distinctive function of paragraph (E)-what it achieves that paragraph (A) does not-is to require substantial evidence to be found within the record of closed-record proceedings to which it exclusively applies.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.