Haskell v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis
745 F.3d 1269 · 2014
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 42 U.S.C. § 14133 (§ 210305 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Alliance for Wild Rockies v. Cottrell · 133 S. Ct. 1958 - Maryland v. King · Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of County of Burlington · Bull v. City of San Francisco
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]hen officers make an arrest supported by probable cause to hold for a serious offense and they bring the suspect to the station to be detained in custody”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Under the Court's rationale [in King], the magnitude of the state's interest does not necessarily depend on the seriousness of the crime of arrest, - As the majority [in King] observed, 'people detained for minor offenses can turn out to be the most devious and dangerous criminals'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Lancaster“[i]f plaintiffs believe they're entitled to a preliminary injunction as to a smaller class, they are free to seek it from the district court and we will review it if and when it is presented to us.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Haskell v. Brown
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.