Davis v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis
745 F.3d 1303 · 2014
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 28 U.S.C. § 1915A · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp. · Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay · United States v. Hinkson · United States v. Perkins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a waiting list for guardian ad litem services”). 3 . The dismissal of an appeal' brought by a prisoner in a federal court of appeals could count as a strike, even if the case was originally filed in -state court and removed to a federal district court by a party other than the prisoner. Section 1915(g) is explicit in referring to an”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Harris v. Mangum
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.