Jackson v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
745 F.3d 206 · 2014
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Williams v. Taylor · North Carolina v. Pearce · Brecht v. Abrahamson · Benton v. Maryland
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When a federal claim has been presented to a state court and the state court has denied relief, it may be presumed that the state court adjudicated the claim on the merits in the absence of any indication or state-law procedural principles to the contrary.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Maslonka v. Hoffner“[C]laims not 'adjudicated on the merits' by the state court are given plenary review by a federal habeas court ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Maslonka v. Hoffner
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.