United States v. Beard’s Empirical Analysis
745 F.3d 288 · 2014
Citation profile
7 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3582 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Bowles v. Russell · Union Pacific R. Co. v. Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen Gen. Comm. of Adjustment, Central Region · United States v. Goodwyn · Romandine v. United States · United States v. Weatherspoon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“§ 3582(c)(2) 's limitation on when a sentence modification is permitted strips the district court of subject-matter jurisdiction to consider an impermissible successive motion”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.