Sutton v. Carpenter’s Empirical Analysis
745 F.3d 787 · 2014
Citation profile
11 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Coleman v. Thompson · 132 S. Ct. 1309 - Martinez v. Ryan · Halbert v. Michigan · 133 S. Ct. 1911 - Trevino v. Thaler · Ex Parte Torres
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“procedural framework, by reason of its design and operation, makes it highly unlikely in a lypical case that a defendant will have a meaningful opportunity to raise a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel on direct appeal, ... Martinez applies.” 133 S.Ct. at 1921 . Tennessee’s procedural framework falls within Trevino's paradigm. See Sutton v. Carpenter, 745 F.3d 787, 792-96 (6th Cir. 2014). 3 . In State v. Richardson, the Tennessee Supreme Court clarified that this two-prong test”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“highly unlikely to have a meaningful opportunity to raise a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel on direct appeal,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.