Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 745 P.2d 1243 - Thorsen v. Johnson

Thorsen v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

2 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently November 2018

2 district · 5 state decisions

301987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Penn. Schuyl. V. R. v. Cleary · Department of Highways v. Schulhoff · 21 Ohio App. 2d 41 - Thatcher v. Lane Construction Co. · 4 Utah 2d 248 - State Ex Rel. Engineering Commission v. Tedesco · 20 Utah 2d 64 - Brereton v. Dixon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is proper to show that a particular tract of land is suitable and available for subdivision into lots and is valuable for that purpose. It is not proper, however, to show' the number and value of lots as separated parcels in an imaginary subdivision thereof. Stated differently, it is improper for the jury to consider an undeveloped tract of land as though a subdivision thereon is an accomplished fact. Such undeveloped property may not be valued on a per lot basis, the cost factor clearly being too speculative.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Thorsen v. Johnson
  2. “[Generally the measure of damages for injury to real property is the difference between the value of the property immediately before and immediately after the injury....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Thorsen v. Johnson

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.