Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 745 P.2d 447 - State v. Wright

State v. Wright’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
4
states following
January 2007
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently January 2007

1 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

50198719902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · United States v. Marion · United States v. Lovasco · Klopfer v. State of North Carolina · United States v. MacDonald

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “at the time the [alleged request for disposition] was sent, defendant had not yet been charged with the ... robbery, and no untried indictment or information was pending against defendant. Thus, nothing triggered the statutory right to demand trial on any "untried indictment or information.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Lindsay
  2. “). 38 . Wright, 745 P.2d at 450 . 39 . See id. (Defendant has not alleged, and the facts do not suggest, that the prosecution delayed the filing of charges against him in order to achieve a tactical advantage.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Hales
  3. “For preaccusation delay to consti tute reversible error, the delay must cause actual prejudice to the defendant's case and result in a tactical advantage for the prosecutor.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Hales

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.