Bryan v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently August 2015
1 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Yamanis v. United States · Good Hope Chemical Corp. Creditors' Committee v. Koerver · Lee v. State · Sanchez v. State · State v. Wilson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“for the purposes of sexual arousal, gratification or abuse”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“In determining whether a factual basis exists for a guilty plea to a general intent crime, the court must only find that the act was done voluntarily. “‘[T]he inference thereupon arises that the defendant intended that which resulted.’” Slaughter v. State, Wyo., 629 P.2d 481, 483-484 (1981), quoting Dorador v. State, Wyo., 573 P.2d 839, 843 (1978). “[W]here the offense is malum prohibi-tum, intent and knowledge are not elements of the crime, unless expressly made so, and all that is required for the commission of the crime is the intentional doing of the prohibited act itself, regardless of whether the doer intended to commit the crime resulting from the intentional act.” (Footnotes omitted.) 22 C.J.S. Criminal Law, § 30, p. 105.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[flirst-degree sexual assault is a general intent crime.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.