Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 745 SO2D 504 - Yashus v. State

Yashus v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
January 2002
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 681 So. 2d 1136 - King v. State · 646 So. 2d 727 - State v. Rinkins · 639 So. 2d 611 - Geohagen v. State · 682 So. 2d 555 - Walker v. State · Norton v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[E]ven where a defendant agrees to habitual offender treatment, if the negotiated plea is for a sentence that does not exceed the statutory maximum for the offense, the court cannot, on a subsequent violation of probation, rely on the earlier agreement to be treated as an habitual offender to then sentence the defendant to an habitual offender sentence on the violation of probation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “although it appears that the court intended to sentence Appellant as a habitual offender, by imposing incarcerative sentences or probationary terms that fell within the guidelines or the statutory maximums, it simply failed to accomplish what it set out to achieve.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “where a defendant agrees to such a sentence as part of an otherwise valid plea agreement and the negotiated sentence does not exceed the statutory maximum for the particular offense involved.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.