745 So. 2d 549 - Moorehead v. Moorehead’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
April 2012
most recently cited
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 464 So. 2d 538 - Walter v. Walter · Sobelman v. Sobelman · 533 So. 2d 791 - Longo v. Longo · 722 So. 2d 280 - Richardson v. Richardson · 695 So. 2d 391 - Hedendal v. Hedendal
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a demonstrated need to protect the alimony recipient.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“more on the side of a long-term marriage than one in the grey area.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hill v. Hooten
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.