Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 745 So. 2d 730 - Lambert v. Toups

745 So. 2d 730 - Lambert v. Toups’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
April 2013
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 549 So. 2d 840 - Rosell v. Esco · 701 So. 2d 1291 - Reeder v. North · 658 So. 2d 209 - Hampton v. Kroger Co. · Hampton v. Kroger Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A. No action for damages against any attorney at law duly admitted to practice in this state, any partnership of such attorneys at law, or any professional corporation, company, organization, association, enterprise, or other commercial business or professional combination authorized by the laws of this state to engage in the practice of law, whether based upon tort, or breach of con tract, or otherwise, arising out of an engagement to provide legal services shall be brought unless filed in a court of competent jurisdiction and proper venue within one year from the date of the alleged act, omission, or neglect, or within one year from the date that the alleged act, omission, or neglect is discovered or should have been discovered; however, even as to actions filed within one year from the date of such discovery, in all events such actions shall be filed at the latest within three years from the date of the alleged act, omission, or neglect, [emphasis added]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the continuous representation rule, which is rooted in the doctrine of contra non valentem, is not available in legal malpractice actions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.