Wallace v. Bond’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
February 2018
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 610 So. 2d 348 - Tilley v. Tilley · 490 So. 2d 866 - Cox v. Moulds · 559 So. 2d 1014 - Thurman v. Thurman · 708 So. 2d 55 - Mizell v. Mizell · Hammett v. Woods
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“provides that, where the amount specified in the guidelines is increased or decreased, the chancellor should make a written finding or specific finding on the record that the application of the guidelines would be unjust or inappropriate.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Klein v. McIntyre
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.