Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 745 SW2D 531 - Carr v. Harris County

Carr v. Harris County’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
February 1998
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 269th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc. · Kirchberg v. Feenstra · Smithson v. Cessna Aircraft Co. · Bodnow Corp. v. City of Hondo · Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. Evans

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the court in which the action is pending may, after notice and hearing, make such orders in regard to the failure [to comply with proper discovery requests or to obey an order] as are just ...”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.