Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 746 F.2d 1183 - United States v. Smith

United States v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

746 F.2d 1183 · 1984

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
August 2017
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently August 2017

9 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

801984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 3500

Relies on Harrington v. California · Eisenstadt v. Baker · Goldberg v. United States · Campbell v. United States · Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs v. Rasmussen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “to rebut an express or implied charge against the declarant of recent fabrication”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.