Scott v. Kuhlmann’s Empirical Analysis
746 F.2d 1377 · 1984
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 9 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 57 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably Albino v. Baca (2014), Fund for Animals, Inc. v. Lujan (1992)
12 federal appellate · 9 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hagans v. Lavine · Eisenstadt v. Baird · Carey v. Population Services International · Sunshine Anthracite Coal Co. v. Adkins · Franklin v. Oregon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Ordinarily affirmative defenses may not be raised by motion to dismiss ... but this is not true when, as here, the defense raises no dispute issues of fact.”) (internal citation omitted). . The 300-day limitations period is applicable in this case because Title VII extends the 180-day period to 300 days if filed in a”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]here is privity between officers of the same government so that a judgment in a suit between a party and a representative of the United States is res judicata in relitigation of the same issue between that party and another officer of the government.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“must affirm a correct decision on any ground fairly supported by the record”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.