Daniels v. Morris’s Empirical Analysis
746 F.2d 271 · 1984
Citation profile
18 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently October 2013 · most notably Gonzalez v. Ysleta Independent School District (1993), Enplanar, Inc. v. Marsh (1994)
18 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Goss v. Lopez · Barker v. Norman · Capital Films Corporation v. Charles Fries Productions, Inc. And American Broadcasting Company · Van Howell v. Tanner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“shall be served at least 10 days before the time fixed for the hearing.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“date certain” on which a motion for summaiy judgment is to be decided by the trial court. Although no hearing was held, Johnson had the opportunity to respond to the motion and in fact did so. Therefore, the requirements of rule 56(c) were met. See id. at 276-77 (”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“When a motion for summary judgment is made and supported as provided in this rule, an adverse party may not rest upon the mere allegations or denials of his pleading, but his response, by affidavits or as otherwise provided in this rule, must set forth specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial. If he does not so respond, summary judgment, if appropriate, shall be entered against him.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Daniels v. Morris
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.