Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 746 F.2d 480 - Harrison v. Heckler

Harrison v. Heckler’s Empirical Analysis

746 F.2d 480 · 1984

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
August 2016
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently August 2016

11 federal appellate · 1 district ·

901984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1383 (§ 1631 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 404 (§ 204 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Califano v. Yamasaki · Lojek v. Thomas · Valente v. Secretary of Health & Human Services · Elliott v. Weinberger · Lewin v. Schwieker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'[T]he decision which must be reached in a fault determination is highly subjective, highly dependent upon the state of mind of the claimant and the peculiar circumstances of his situation.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(a) An incorrect statement made by the individual which he knew or should have known to be incorrect; or (b) Failure to furnish information which he knew or should have known to be material; or (c) With respect to the overpaid individual only, acceptance of a payment which he either knew or could have been expected to know was incorrect.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The Secretary (A) shall make such provision as he finds appropriate in the case of payment of more than the correct amount of benefits with respect to an individual with a view to avoiding penalizing such individual or his eligible spouse who was without fault in connection with the overpayment, if adjustment or recovery on account of such overpayment in such case would defeat the purposes of this subchapter, or be against equity and good con science____”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.