Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 746 F.2d 839 - International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Donovan

International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Donovan’s Empirical Analysis

746 F.2d 839 · 1984

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
August 2003
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2003

4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

80198419902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 19 U.S.C. § 2101 (Customs and Trade Act of 1990) · 19 U.S.C. § 2291 · 19 U.S.C. § 2296 · 19 U.S.C. § 2297 · 19 U.S.C. § 2298 · 19 U.S.C. § 2311 · 19 U.S.C. § 2313 · 28 U.S.C. § 294

Relies on Warth v. Seldin · Sierra Club v. Morton · National Association for Advancement of Colored People v. Y Button · National Association for Advancement of Colored People v. State of Alabama Patterson · American Pipe & Construction Co. v. Utah

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] determination by a cooperating State agency with respect to entitlement to program benefits . . . is subject to review in the same manner and to the same extent as determinations under the applicable State law [regarding unemployment compensation benefits] and only in that manner and to that extent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Judicial review of a state agency's determination of benefits under its own unemployment insurance law may not be had without the presence of the state agency, [and] since the state agencies are outside the district court's jurisdiction, it may not be had here.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “that review of determinations with respect to TRA benefits must be 'in the same manner' as a determination under the state's unemployment insurance law,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.