Moret v. Karn’s Empirical Analysis
746 F.2d 989 · 1984
Citation profile
25 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently June 2014 · most notably Amanullah v. Nelson (1987), Marshall v. Lansing (1988)
25 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 5 U.S.C. § 706 · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation Same · Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation · Jean v. Nelson · Rodriguez-Fernandez v. Wilkinson · Miguel Mayet Palma v. R. J. Verdeyen, William French Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'the court may not uphold the order unless it is sustainable on the agency’s findings and for the reasons stated by the agency’”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he appropriate standard of review in such cases is whether the agency’s decision is “arbitrary, capricious, and abuse of discretion or otherwise not in accordance with the law.” 5 U.S.C. § 706 (2)(A) [the APA]. ... This standard of review is consistent with the legislative history of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bakhtriger v. Elwood“An agency abuses its discretion if it fails to follow its own regulations and procedures.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.