Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 746 F.3d 614 - United States v. Shoemaker

United States v. Shoemaker’s Empirical Analysis

746 F.3d 614 · 2014

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
July 2025
most recently cited

9 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 1014 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 666 · 42 U.S.C. § 1320A (§ 1121 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1320A (§ 1128b of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Bourjaily v. United States · Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn. · Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of Ohio · Sabri v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Lastly, Shoemaker submits that the Government prejudiced his defense by failing to comply with Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 , 83 S.Ct. 1194 , 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963).... We have considered the parties’ submissions and reviewed the record. Because we conclude that sufficient evidence supported Shoemaker’s remaining convictions, and otherwise find no errors warranting reversal or a new trial, we affirm Shoemaker’s convictions on Counts Three and Counts Six through Twelve.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “For the foregoing reasons, we VACATE the district court’s grants of Garner’s and Shoemaker’s motions for judgment of acquittal and new trial, AFFIRM Shoemaker’s other convictions, and REMAND for reinstatement of the jury verdict and for sentencing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “with formal authority to effect the desired referral or recommendation.... But as explained below, Miles imposed no such limitation on the meaning of”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.