Joffe v. Google, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
746 F.3d 920 · 2013
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1343 · 18 U.S.C. § 2101 · 18 U.S.C. § 2510 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 2511 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 2520 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 47 U.S.C. § 153 · 7 U.S.C. § 2156
Relies on Robinson v. Shell Oil Co. · Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc. · Smith v. United States · Mart Corporation v. Cartier Inc 47th Street Photo Inc · Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Because we must interpret the statute consistently, whether we encounter its application in a criminal or noncriminal context, the rule of lenity applies.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Moore v. Smith“Congress 'sometimes drafts provisions that appear duplicative of others . . . to clarify what might be doubtful -- that the mentioned item is covered.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.