746 F. Supp. 1471 - Vigil Ex Rel. Vigil v. Rhoades’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 20 U.S.C. § 1401 · 25 U.S.C. § 13 · 25 U.S.C. § 1601 (Alaska Native and American Indian Direct Reimbursement Act of 2000) · 25 U.S.C. § 1602 · 28 U.S.C. § 2201 · 28 U.S.C. § 2202 · 31 U.S.C. § 1301 (Postal Savings System Statute of Limitations Act) · 5 U.S.C. § 551 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946)
Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Conley v. Gibson · Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe · Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association of United States Inc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Consumer Alert · Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“direct, supervise, and expend [Congressional appropriations] for the benefit, care, and assistance of the Indians throughout the United States for ... relief of distress and conservation of health.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Vigil v. Rhoades“depriv[es] the Indians of benefits that have long been provided them, [it] must 'bend over backwards' to assure fair treatment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Vigil v. Rhoades“had learned of the existence of the Program and cognized that fact in fashioning its Indian-related appropriations....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Vigil v. Rhoades
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.