746 F. Supp. 604 - Bartucco v. Wright’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Tucker v. Fireman's Fund Insurance · Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Inc. v. Department of Employment & Training · Stewart v. United Electric Light & Power Co. · Bulala v. Boyd · Walston v. Sun Cab Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[For the purpose] of providing the limitation on an award for noneconomic damages applies [sic] in a wrongful death action in which the cause of action arises on or after a certain date; providing for the application of the limitation on an award for noneconomic damages in a personal injury or wrongful death action to certain persons and actions; increasing the limitation on an award for noneconomic damages in certain causes of action arising on or after a certain date; providing for an annual increase in the limitation on an award for noneconomic damages; establishing a certain limitation on an award for noneconomic damages in which there is a certain number of claimants or beneficiaries; providing for the reduction of an award in certain wrongful death actions under certain circumstances; defining the term “noneconomic damages” for purposes of applying the limitation on an award for noneconomic damages in a wrongful death action; providing for the effective date of and application of certain provisions of this Act; and generally relating to the limitation on an award for noneconomic damages in certain actions. ^ providing for the construction”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the Maryland cap on nonpecuniary damages should be applied individually to each wrongful death plaintiff, rather than to the class as a whole.” Id. at 612 . 5 . When two or more persons claim non-economic damages in a wrongful death action, one cap applies to all claimants, although the cap amount is increased by 150%. See 11 — 108(b)(3)(ii). 6 . In actions brought by the Division of Consumer Protection of the Office of the Attorney General violators of the CPA may be subject to”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.