746 F. Supp. 2d 8 - In Re Veiga’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1782
Relies on Intel Corp. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. · Carlyle Fortran Trust v. NVIDIA Corp. · Euromepa v. Esmerian, Inc. · John Deere Limited v. Sperry Corporation · 709 F. Supp. 2d 283 - In Re Application of Chevron Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the burden imposed upon an applicant is de minimis "). I find that Applicants have made a de minimis showing that the discovery sought is for use in the Winding Up Proceeding, and therefore the proceeding satisfies the "for use”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[A]bsent authoritative proof that a foreign tribunal would reject the evidence obtained ... a district court should not refrain from granting the assistance afforded under the Act based simply on allegations to that effect.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“). I find that Applicants have made a de minimis showing that the discovery sought is for use in the Winding Up Proceeding, and therefore the proceeding satisfies the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.