Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 746 N.E.2d 920 - Young v. State

Young v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Williams v. Taylor · Williams v. State · Roach v. State · Marcum v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[The defendant must show that counsel's performance was deficient .... [and] that the deficient performance prejudiced the defense. .... The two prongs of the Strick land test are separate and independent inquiries [and] 'f it is easier to dispose of an ineffectiveness claim on the ground of lack of sufficient prejudice ... that course should be followed.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) The declarant testifies and is subject to cross-examination about a prior statement, and the statement: (A) is inconsistent with the declarant’s testimony and was given under penalty of perjury at a . trial, hearing, or other proceeding or in a deposition.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.