Young v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Williams v. Taylor · Williams v. State · Roach v. State · Marcum v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[The defendant must show that counsel's performance was deficient .... [and] that the deficient performance prejudiced the defense. .... The two prongs of the Strick land test are separate and independent inquiries [and] 'f it is easier to dispose of an ineffectiveness claim on the ground of lack of sufficient prejudice ... that course should be followed.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bunch v. State“(1) The declarant testifies and is subject to cross-examination about a prior statement, and the statement: (A) is inconsistent with the declarant’s testimony and was given under penalty of perjury at a . trial, hearing, or other proceeding or in a deposition.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.