Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 746 N.W.2d 270 - State v. Abrahamson

State v. Abrahamson’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Barker v. Wingo · Strunk v. United States · Hilbert v. Dooling · State v. Halliburton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The court may, on motion of the state, either before or during the trial, order the indictment amended so as to correct errors or omissions in matters of form or substance. Amendment is not allowed if substantial rights of the defendant are prejudiced by the amendment, or if a wholly new or different offense is charged.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[I]n order to obtain a valid dismissal in the interests of justice (and the resulting benefit of a dismissal without prejudice), the State must provide appropriate and sufficient reasons for the dismissal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.