Andreanoff v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

5 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “§ 66-8-55. Proceedings where indictment not found a true bill. [Wjhen a person has been held to answer a criminal charge, and the indictment in relation thereto is not found “a true bill,” ... it must be [ejndorsed “not a true bill,” which [ejndorsement must be signed by the foreman, and presented to the court and filed with the clerk, and remain a public record; but in the case of an indictment not found “a true bill” against a person not so held, the same, together with the minutes of the evidence in relation thereto, must be destroyed by the grand jury. § 66-8-56. —Effect: Re-examination by jury. [Wjhen an indictment [ejndorsed “not a true bill” has been presented in court and filed, the effect thereof is to dismiss the charge; and the same can not be again submitted to or inquired of by the grand jury, unless the court so orders.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Ephamka v. State

2. “Effect of failure to return indictment. When a grand jury does not return an indictment, the charge is dismissed, and it may not be again submitted to or inquired into by the grand jury unless the court so orders.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Ephamka v. State