Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 746 SO2D 1182 - Blakley v. State

Blakley v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

45 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently September 2018 · most notably 848 So. 2d 287 - State v. McBride (2003), 786 So. 2d 1173 - Carter v. State (2001)

45 state decisions

300199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 714 So. 2d 429 - State v. Mancino · State v. Callaway · Davis v. State · 448 So. 2d 1013 - State v. Rhoden · 487 So. 2d 1045 - State v. Whitfield

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a kind of punishment that no judge under the entire body of sentencing statutes could possibly inflict under any set of factual circumstances.”
    16 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
    e.g. Bruno v. State · Allen v. State
  2. “are those that are illegal because they exceed the [statutory] maximum, ... those that were unconstitutionally increased after they had been imposed, and those for which no record, earned jail credit was given,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
    e.g. 756 So. 2d 1080 - Austin v. State · 876 So. 2d 1238 - Scanes v. State
  3. “If there is error in any other kind of sentence, and particularly if it involves any factual inquiry, under the current decisions of our supreme court such error must be corrected in direct review or possibly under rule 3.850, but not under rule 3.800(a)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
    e.g. Smith v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.