Turner v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
25 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently September 2016 · most notably Christian v. Gray (2003), 924 So. 2d 737 - Turner v. State (2003)
25 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Frye v. United States · Nebraska v. Wyoming · State Oil Co. v. Khan · Nebraska v. Wyoming
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"[w]hether otherwise reliable testing procedures were performed without error in a particular case goes to the weight of the evidence, not its admissibility. Only if a party challenges the performance of a reliable and relevant technique and shows that the performance was so particularly and critically deficient that it undermined the reliability of the technique, will evidence that is otherwise reliable and relevant be deemed inadmissible."”
8 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Ex Parte Taylor · J.H.H. v. State“". . . Unlike Perry, 586 So.2d at 250 , Daubert does not require the accuracy of the testing in the particular case to be assessed at the admissibility stage."”
7 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. J.H.H. v. State · Petric v. State“I. Are the theory and the technique (i.e., the principle and the methodology) on which the proffered DNA forensic evidence is based `reliable'?”
7 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Ex Parte Taylor · Petric v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.