Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 746 SO2D 475 - Rx Solutions v. Express Pharmacy Services

Rx Solutions v. Express Pharmacy Services’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
August 2021
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently August 2021

1 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

501999200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 664 So. 2d 1000 - Emergency Associates of Tampa PA v. Sassano · Ace Electric Supply Co. v. Terra Nova Electric, Inc. · 329 So. 2d 323 - Landis v. Mears · 552 So. 2d 288 - Templeton v. Creative Loafing Tampa, Inc. · 641 So. 2d 103 - Lovell Farms, Inc. v. Levy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]hen a contract is rendered ambiguous by some collateral matter, it has a latent ambiguity, and the court must hear parol evidence to interpret the writing properly.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A latent ambiguity—as distinct from a patent ambiguity— arises `where the language employed is clear and intelligible and suggests but a single meaning, but some extrinsic fact or extraneous evidence creates a necessity for interpretation or a choice among two or more possible meanings.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.