Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 746 So. 2d 901 - Bruce v. State

746 So. 2d 901 - Bruce v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
November 2008
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · McClain v. State · 454 So. 2d 468 - Stringer v. State · Carr v. State · 381 So. 2d 983 - Jones v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The chain of custody of evidence in the control of the authorities is usually determined within the sound discretion of the trial judge, and unless this judicial discretion has been so abused as to be prejudicial to the defendant, this Court will not reverse the rulings of the trial court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.