Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 746 SW2D 352 - Otero-Miranda v. State

Otero-Miranda v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
February 2010
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently February 2010

8 state decisions

401988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ohio v. Roberts · Chambers v. Mississippi · California v. Green · Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Barber v. Page

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Unavailability as a witness” includes situations in which the declarant: [[Image here]] (4) is unable to be present or to testify at the hearing because of death or then existing physical or mental illness or infirmity; or (5) is absent from the hearing and the proponent of his statement has been unable to procure his attendance or testimony by process or other reasonable means. Caldwell contends that the State failed to”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) Former testimony. Testimony given as a witness at another hearing of the same or a different proceeding, if the party against whom the testimony is now offered had an opportunity and similar motive to develop the testimony by direct, cross, or redirect examination.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.