Fillinger v. Fuller’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
June 2000
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Texaco, Inc. v. Pennzoil, Co. · Clancy v. Zale Corp. · Roy Jones Lumber Co. v. Murphy · United States v. Duzac · Robinson Electric Supply Co. v. Cadillac Cable Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“b. A juror may not testify as to any matter or statement occurring during the course of the jury's deliberations or to the effect of anything upon his or any other juror's mind or emotions as influencing him to assent to or dissent from the verdict concerning his mental processes in connection therewith, except that a juror may testify whether any outside influence was improperly brought to bear upon any juror. Nor may his affidavit or evidence of any statement by him concerning a matter about which he would be precluded from testifying be received for these purposes.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“whether extraneous prejudicial information was improperly brought to the jury's attention.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.