Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 747 A2D 1137 - Ray v. Queen

Ray v. Queen’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
May 2021
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 9 district · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently May 2021 · most notably Mushroom Transportation Company Inc v. H & Pc, 451 F. Supp. 2d 16 - Johnson v. LONG BEACH MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2001-4 (2006)

3 federal appellate · 9 district · 11 state decisions

170200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Glus v. Brooklyn Eastern District Terminal · Insurance Company v. Wilkinson · Kilbourn v. Sunderland · Willis v. Maverick

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The client must feel free to rely on his attorney's advice. Facts which might ordinarily require investigation likely may not excite suspicion where a fiduciary relationship is involved.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Burtch v. Ganz · In Re: Mushroom Transportation Company, Inc., Debtor. Jeoffrey Burtch Mushroom Transportation Co., Inc. Penn York Realty Company, Inc. Robbey Realty Inc. Trux Enterprises Teamsters Pension Trust Fund of Philadelphia Charles J. Schaffer, Jr. William J. Einhorn Raymond A. Huber Hubert C. Dietrich Robert J. Ewanco William D. Gross Thomas R. Johnston Joseph P. Santone William J. Dillner, Jr. James H. Hutchinson, Jr. John P. O'COnnOr Anthony R. Simones Freight Drivers & Helpers Local 557 Pension Fund Daniel L. Sandy v. Jonathan H. Ganz Pincus Verlin Hahn & Reich, P.C. Pincus Reich Hahn Dubroff & Ganz, P.C. Modell Pincus Hahn & Reich, P.C. Pincus Verlin Bluestein Hahn & Reich, P.C. Astor Weiss & Newman Rawle & Henderson Continental Bank Erwin L. Pincus Richard L. Hahn Pace Reich Jerome J. Verlin Andrew F. Napoli Ronald Bluestein Herman P. Weinberg David N. Bressler Allen B. Dubroff Jeoffrey Burtch, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Mushroom Transportation Company, Inc., Successor to Robbey Realty, Inc., Penn York Realty Company, Inc., and Trux Enterprises, Inc. And Successor to Michael Arnold, Former Trustee in Bankruptcy, Mushroom Transportation Company, Inc., Robbey Realty, Inc., Penn York Realty Company, Inc., and Trux Enterprises, Inc., the Teamsters Pension Trust Fund of Philadelphia and Vicinity, Charles J. Schaffer, Jr., in His Official Capacity as a Fiduciary, by His Successor in Office, William J. Einhorn, Raymond A. Huber, Herbert C. Dietrich, Robert J. Ewanco, William D. Gross, Thomas R. Johnston, Joseph P. Santone, William J. Dillner, Jr., James H. Hutchinson, Jr., John P. O'COnnOr and Anthony R. Simones, Trustees of the Western Pennsylvania, Teamsters and Employers Pension Fund or Their Successors, and Freight Drivers & Helpers Local 557 Pension Fund and Daniel L. Sandy, a Fiduciary, or His Successor and Any Other Named or Deemed Substituted (By Virtue of His Office) or Other Successor
  2. “In determining whether the plaintiff exercised reasonable diligence, the courts should consider, inter alia, whether there was a fiduciary relationship between the parties.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. In Re: Mushroom Transportation Company, Inc., Debtor. Jeoffrey Burtch Mushroom Transportation Co., Inc. Penn York Realty Company, Inc. Robbey Realty Inc. Trux Enterprises Teamsters Pension Trust Fund of Philadelphia Charles J. Schaffer, Jr. William J. Einhorn Raymond A. Huber Hubert C. Dietrich Robert J. Ewanco William D. Gross Thomas R. Johnston Joseph P. Santone William J. Dillner, Jr. James H. Hutchinson, Jr. John P. O'COnnOr Anthony R. Simones Freight Drivers & Helpers Local 557 Pension Fund Daniel L. Sandy v. Jonathan H. Ganz Pincus Verlin Hahn & Reich, P.C. Pincus Reich Hahn Dubroff & Ganz, P.C. Modell Pincus Hahn & Reich, P.C. Pincus Verlin Bluestein Hahn & Reich, P.C. Astor Weiss & Newman Rawle & Henderson Continental Bank Erwin L. Pincus Richard L. Hahn Pace Reich Jerome J. Verlin Andrew F. Napoli Ronald Bluestein Herman P. Weinberg David N. Bressler Allen B. Dubroff Jeoffrey Burtch, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Mushroom Transportation Company, Inc., Successor to Robbey Realty, Inc., Penn York Realty Company, Inc., and Trux Enterprises, Inc. And Successor to Michael Arnold, Former Trustee in Bankruptcy, Mushroom Transportation Company, Inc., Robbey Realty, Inc., Penn York Realty Company, Inc., and Trux Enterprises, Inc., the Teamsters Pension Trust Fund of Philadelphia and Vicinity, Charles J. Schaffer, Jr., in His Official Capacity as a Fiduciary, by His Successor in Office, William J. Einhorn, Raymond A. Huber, Herbert C. Dietrich, Robert J. Ewanco, William D. Gross, Thomas R. Johnston, Joseph P. Santone, William J. Dillner, Jr., James H. Hutchinson, Jr., John P. O'COnnOr and Anthony R. Simones, Trustees of the Western Pennsylvania, Teamsters and Employers Pension Fund or Their Successors, and Freight Drivers & Helpers Local 557 Pension Fund and Daniel L. Sandy, a Fiduciary, or His Successor and Any Other Named or Deemed Substituted (By Virtue of His Office) or Other Successor · Mushroom Transportation Company Inc v. H & Pc
  3. “The rule that, in cases of fraud, the statute of limitations begins to run only from the time of the discovery of the fraud, will not apply where the party affected by the fraud might, with ordinary diligence, have discovered it. But the failure to use such diligence may be excused where there exists some relation of trust and confidence ... between the party committing the fraud and the party who is affected by it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.