United States v. Dack’s Empirical Analysis
747 F.2d 1172 · 1984
Citation profile
36 federal appellate · 1 district · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently July 2011 · most notably State v. Colton (1995), Ullmann v. State (1994)
36 federal appellate · 1 district · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 6151 · 26 U.S.C. § 7201
Relies on Sansone v. United States · Coastal Steel Corp. v. Wheelabrator-Frye, Inc. · Erickson v. United States · Dames & Moore v. Regan · United States v. Bishop
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Where evidence is easily available from other sources and absent 'extraordinary circumstances' or 'compelling reasons,' an attorney who participates in the case should not be called as a witness.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Matheney v. State · Ahern v. Scholz“of a tax, and (2) the willful attempt to evade or defeat the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.