United States v. Newport’s Empirical Analysis
747 F.2d 1307 · 1984
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently July 2001
7 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Weintraub · Cruz v. Hauck · Taylor v. Kentucky · G. M. Leasing Corp. v. United States · Armedo-Sarmiento v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“doubt. The district court instructed the jury as follows: 59 Now, reasonable doubt is a real doubt based upon reason and common sense after a careful and impartial consideration of all the evidence in the case. 60 McCarty argues that this definition was”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Real” is defined in Webster’s Third New International Dictionary 1890 (1976) as”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.