Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 747 F.2d 1469 - Shaw v. Library of Congress

Shaw v. Library of Congress’s Empirical Analysis

747 F.2d 1469 · 1984

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
4
cited 4 times by the Supreme Court
June 2008
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 6 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2008 · most notably Library of Congress v. Shaw (1986), Loeffler v. Frank (1988)

10 federal appellate · 6 district ·

190198419902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1920 · 28 U.S.C. § 1961 · 28 U.S.C. § 2411 · 28 U.S.C. § 2412 · 28 U.S.C. § 2516 · 28 U.S.C. § 2517 · 28 U.S.C. § 2671 · 28 U.S.C. § 2674

Relies on Hensley v. Eckerhart · Alyeska Pipeline Service Company v. Wilderness Society · United States v. Testan · United States v. Sherwood · United States v. Turkette

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the United States shall be liable for costs the same as a private person.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “consistently ... recognized that federal statutes cannot be read to permit interest to run on a recovery against the United States unless Congress affirmatively mandates that result.... When Congress has intended to waive the United States' immunity with respect to interest, it has done so expressly.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “In any action or proceeding under this subchapter the court, in its discretion, may allow the prevailing party, other than the [EEOC] or the United States, a reasonable attorney's fee as part of the costs, and the [EEOC] and the United States shall be liable for costs the same as a private person.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.