United States v. Barnes’s Empirical Analysis
747 F.2d 246 · 1984
Citation profile
39 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently April 2022 · most notably United States v. Brooks (1992), United States v. Jones (1990)
39 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 371
Relies on Glasser v. United States · Burks v. United States · Remmer v. United States · Blumenthal v. United States · Acosta v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a reasonable possibility that the jury's verdict was influenced by the material that improperly came before it.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“common purpose and plan may be inferred from all the circumstances”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Furthermore, there is a presumption of prejudice where such improper evidence has been made available to the jury, and the burden is on the government to prove that it is harmless.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.