Schroeder v. Lotito’s Empirical Analysis
747 F.2d 801 · 1984
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently May 2001
5 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1111 (§ 29 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act)) · 15 U.S.C. § 1114 (§ 32 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act)) · 15 U.S.C. § 1117 (§ 35 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act)) · 15 U.S.C. § 1125 (§ 43 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act))
Relies on Mishawaka Rubber & Woolen Manufacturing Co. v. S. S. Kresge Co. · Bostitch, Inc. v. King Fastener Co.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.