Pinar v. Dole’s Empirical Analysis
747 F.2d 899 · 1984
Citation profile
65 federal appellate · 10 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 110 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2019 · most notably United States v. Fausto (1988), Saul v. United States (1991)
65 federal appellate · 10 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 5 U.S.C. § 1206 · 5 U.S.C. § 2302 · 5 U.S.C. § 701 · 5 U.S.C. § 702 · 5 U.S.C. § 7503 · 5 U.S.C. § 7511 · 5 U.S.C. § 7513
Relies on Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Mathews v. Eldridge · Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Morrissey v. Brewer · Wolff v. McDonnell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 110 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'to create a new substantive legal liability without legislative aid and as at the common law,' because we are convinced that Congress is in a better position to decide whether or not the public interest would be served by creating it.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he absence of a provision for direct judicial review . . . among the carefully structured remedial provisions of the CSRA is evidence of Congress' intent that no judicial review in district court be available . . . .”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“special factors counselling hesitation in the absence of affirmative action by Congress”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Yokum v. Frank · Dotson v. Griesa
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.