United States v. Malone’s Empirical Analysis
747 F.3d 481 · 2014
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3663 · 18 U.S.C. § 3663A (§ 204 of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 3664
Relies on United States v. Reifler · United States v. Gallant · United States v. Black · United States v. Uri Sheinbaum · United States v. Gushlak
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In no case shall the fact that a victim has received or is entitled to receive compensation with respect to a loss from insurance or any other source be considered in determining the amount of restitution.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[j]udges do not always speak as clearly as they would write, and it would be wrong to interpret imperfection in oral expression to mean more than the context suggests it means.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the burden on the sentencing process posed by determining complex issues of fact”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Brown
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.