Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 747 N.W.2d 566 - Butt v. Schmidt

Butt v. Schmidt’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
June 2014
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Thiele v. Stich · Moylan v. Moylan · Thompson v. Barnes · Marriage of Karon v. Karon · State v. Mauer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In Karon , we recognized that section 518.64 allows a court to modify a maintenance award upon petition of a party. We concluded, however, that when a district court incorporates into its dissolution order a stipulation by the parties as to maintenance, the order is a final decree with a preclusive effect. Thus, if the court’s final decree includes such an express waiver precluding the right to any further maintenance, the court is divested of its jurisdiction over the maintenance issue because any later attempts to modify spousal maintenance are barred by issue preclusion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “1) the stipulation must include a contractual waiver of the parties’ rights to modify maintenance; 2) the stipulation must expressly divest the district court of jurisdiction over maintenance, Loo, 520 N.W.2d at 745-46 ; 3) the stipulation must be incorporated into the final judgment and decree; and 4) the court must make “specific findings that the stipulation is fair and equitable, is supported by consideration described in the findings, and that full disclosure of each party’s financial circumstances has occurred,” Minn.Stat. § 518.552, subd. 5.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The parties may expressly preclude or limit modification of maintenance through a stipulation, if the court makes specific findings that the stipulation is fair and equitable, is supported by consideration described in the findings, and that full disclosure of each party’s financial circumstances has occurred. The stipulation must be made a part' of the judgment and decree.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.